data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26c2f/26c2fdc588a11a8b121fe7a3c308e9fe2b4194ea" alt="Minolta autocord cds iii manual"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a516/8a51696adea1f9d48bc6335b96a37941a556ab83" alt="minolta autocord cds iii manual minolta autocord cds iii manual"
I don’t know if the Autocord is “better” or “worse” than a Rolleiflex, but I do know that even a “low end” Rolleiflex was outside my budget, while my Autocord – purchased off eBay, fully functional and in decent condition – was much more affordable. Just “borderline cult”.īut I have no complaints it keeps the prices down. This is peak Minolta – not famous enough to be in the Rolleiflex/Nikon class not rare enough to be a cult camera. A 1995 issue of Popular Photography included the Autocord in a list of “borderline cult cameras”. Funnily enough, the Minolta Autocord shares a similar fate, living as it does in the shadow of the Rolleiflex.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ed32/2ed325cee8136e931d1becbbcd6a848e940937a9" alt="minolta autocord cds iii manual minolta autocord cds iii manual"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/194ba/194ba8c55e8801c5de203ff2cac53b8307f5c3e0" alt="minolta autocord cds iii manual minolta autocord cds iii manual"
I happen to think that compared to more famous brands like Nikon and Canon, Minolta’s 35mm SLRs and lenses were (and still are) underrated and underpriced – and I’ve always been partial to underdogs and good bargains. My first “real” camera was my father’s Minolta SLR, still in regular use. Meanwhile on the topic of disclosures, I also admit to a bit of a Minolta bias. Dante Stella, Mike Eckman, Casual Photophile, Tobias Key – praise the Autocord’s handling, design and build quality, reserving special plaudits for the Rokkor lens (which I’ll come to a bit later). While I may one day add a high end Rolleiflex to my collection, … the Autocord does everything the Rollei does, and does it for a fraction of the price.įull disclosure: I’ve only shot one roll of film with my Autocord so far, so I’m not qualified to write a proper review. And I don’t mind shooting without a meter – sometimes I use a phone app, sometimes I just guess.Īdvertisements: Popular Photography 1956 (left) and 1957 (right) showing both meterless and metered versions The Autocord and other TLRs It does not have a light meter, but I personally prefer the meterless Autocord variants (mainly for aesthetic reasons I’m shallow like that). My model is an Autocord I, manufactured in 1965. All variants share some common features including a superb taking lens – a Rokkor 75mm f/3.5 with four elements in three groups (Tessar-type). Other differences are relatively minor, like cosmetic changes to the nameplate or slightly different shutter speed sequences. Probably the most significant variation is that the L and CDS models have a light meter (selenium for the Ls, CdS for the CDSs). Some take 120 film only while others take both 120 and 220. Produced from 1955–66, the Autocord came in a number of variants. The Minolta Autocord is a fully-mechanical twin-lens reflex camera which takes 6×6 photos on medium-format film. Chiyoda aimed for the fences with their new camera … and hit it out of the park.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26c2f/26c2fdc588a11a8b121fe7a3c308e9fe2b4194ea" alt="Minolta autocord cds iii manual"